Nuovo Regolamento di Mediazione italiano – New Italian Mediation Rules
Nuovo Regolamento di Mediazione italiano – New Italian Mediation Rules | IT | EN | FR | Il Centro di Mediazione per l’Europa, il Mediterraneo
News
Continue Reading »
CEM Qualified Assessment Program (QAP)
The Centre de Médiation de l’Europe de la Méditerranée et du Moyen Orient (CEM), Italian Delegation, is glad to announce the opening of an
Business Lunch on “Punti Forti per un Definitivo Riordino del Processo Civile” (Milan – 5 December 2019)
We are glad to invite you to our next business lunch, which will be held on 5 December 2019 at the Hotel de la Ville
Milan Investment Arbitration Pre-Moot 2020
DLA Piper, in cooperation with Università degli Studi, Milan and the European Court of Arbitration (Milan section), is organizing the first edition of the Milan
Training Course on Negotiation (Milan – 25 October 2019)
We are glad to invite you to the Training Course on Negotiation which we organize with the Milan Bar Association for Friday 25 October
Med-Mid XIII – Paris – 21 October 2019
We are glad to invite you to our 13th Med-Mid conference, which this year will have the shape of a seminar organised together with
4th Edition of International Arbitration
We are glad to inform that the 4th edition of International Arbitration by our President has just been published by Bruylant this time in French
Mediation and labour disputes?
Mediation and labour disputes. A love that can hardly blossom. There are two types of labour conflicts (to be very synthetic). a- Individual or
Business Lunch on “The Role of the Decision Tree in Negotiation” (Milan – 27 June 2019)
We are glad to invite you to our next business lunch, which will be held on 27 June 2019 at the Hotel de la Ville
Special provisions to challenge declarations of jurisdiction or of lack of jurisdiction in respect of arbitration agreement under Italian CPR
Special provisions to challenge declarations of jurisdiction or of lack of jurisdiction in respect of arbitration agreement under Italian CPR Comment on I.G. v. I.P,
